As I type this I am in Washington DC. I’m here for meetings.
The last time I was here was in late 2014 for the same reason. The purpose is
to provide various government entities (and some journalists) with important
information “from the ground” regarding what is going on in Burundi. Though
there is much to discuss about the political situation, my focus is more on the
humanitarian. I was often baited into speculating about the politics, and it’s
tempting to do so, but I really need to hone in on the serious issues facing
the population including food insecurity, malnutrition, etc.
For the visit I fortunately had the assistance of my
colleague Natalie who is based in DC. She basically took my briefing
information and turned them into talking points and makes sure I understand
where the various stakeholders are coming from. I am admittedly a novice at
this sort of thing. Yes, I’ve done it before but there were new people to meet
with this time and I still have a hard time understanding the inner workings
(vested interest) that influence what people want to know. One example this
time was that Obama had recently released a draft budget and almost everyone
brought it up. It was important to understand how it influenced what they wanted
to know from me.
It’s obviously not altogether altruistic. We also need these
meetings to make sure the organization as a whole stays on their radar, to make
sure that people understand the gravity of the issues that I see and to some
extent try to influence policies that affect the people we serve. It’s obviously
a tall order and you need to be realistic about your expectations. But overall
I was happy with how things went.
The first day began with a briefing at our DC office. We
basically go through the agenda and discuss any questions about the talking
points. They’d largely been hammered out in advance by email so it was pretty
straight forward. From there we spent the next two days bouncing from taxi to
meeting to taxi to meeting. Natalie is really good at this – keeping us on
schedule, filling in gaps in my comments, sometimes refocusing conversations. I
was the content guy and she was the one making sure we dotted our eyes and
crossing our t’s. It worked as it is supposed to.
The key meetings were with the State Department, funding
agencies (USAID, OFDA and PRM), the White House (national security), Senate Foreign
Relations Committee staff, House FRC staff and two senators’ offices. Time was
so tight that one of the conversations with a journalist had to be done mostly in
a taxi going from one meeting to the next. By the end of day two I was pretty
spent. As I said, it’s hard to know what impact the discussions may have but
they are likely a small piece in a large mosaic of discussions these people have.
I did get a nice email yesterday from someone in the State Department who was
in one of the meetings saying how valuable she felt the conversation was for
her to hear from someone based in the country. Good to know.
So now I’m off to NY. A full week of more meetings awaits.
Sigh. I miss my family.
No comments:
Post a Comment